A Skeptics' Skeptic PDF/EPUB ✓ A Skeptics' PDF or

A Skeptics' Skeptic PDF/EPUB ✓ A Skeptics' PDF or



10 thoughts on “A Skeptics' Skeptic

  1. RICHARD KOSHEL RICHARD KOSHEL says:

    DISAPPOINTEDJust as the title of the book suggests, I am skeptical of the material presented It is not a good read.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

A Skeptics' Skeptic ⚣ [PDF] ✅ A Skeptics' Skeptic By Massimo Pigliucci ✰ – Centrumpowypadkowe.co.uk I ve been writing about skepticism meaning, taking a skeptical stance on pseudo science, pseudo philosophy, pseudo politics, and a few other pseudos since as far back as , when I began organizing Darw I ve been writing about skepticism meaning, taking a skeptical stance on pseudo science, pseudo philosophy, pseudo politics, and a few other pseudos since as far back as , when I began organizing Darwin Day events at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville From time to time, over the interveningor so years, I found myself turning A Skeptics' PDF or my gadfly sh keyboard toward other skeptics, usually famous ones The reason is that it seems to me that a community such as the skeptic atheist humanist S A H, for short one that prides itself in its intellectualism and openness to reason and evidence, ought to critically examine its own tenets and positions, especially when espoused by prominent members of said community Indeed, one of the gratifying things about being a skeptic is precisely that, by and large, we don t act like a church We recoil from dogmas, and we don t ostracize dissenting members of our community, immediately rushing to build a new church down the street Or do we Well, okay, the recent history of the S A H community actually does sometimes eerily recall religious schisms and doctrinal disputes Still, at least we don t burn people at the stakes, or launch fatwas against them The gentle reader will notice that several of the essays included in the Skeptics Skeptic collection are, ahem, quite ironic, even sarcastic at times, certainly so than the typical Rationally Speaking post There are reasons for that To begin with, the people targeted here are Big Boys who can definitely take the heat many are academics, and academics are selected for having a thick skin Moreover, rest assured that they can and have, in several cases fight back with equal or larger force But the most important explanation for my above average forcefulness here is that I take public intellectualism seriously, and these people are somewhat major public intellectuals They influence countless others, and they therefore bear the responsibility of writing rigorously as well as clearly When they don t in my opinion, of course I call them out It should go without saying, but I ll say it any way contra persistent insinuations to the contrary by, say, The Discovery Institute, the inane think tank that promotes Intelligent Design creationism , these and other writings by yours truly do not signal the beginning of a move away from my philosophical naturalism, support for science, or defense of reason They are simply cases in which I deploy precisely those tools to engage the best minds of the S A H, so that we as a broader movement can keep Carl Sagan s famous candle in the dark alit against the always numerous and always powerful forces of obscurantism and repression.