The Real Case for Auschwitz Holocaust Handbooks Book 22
- Kindle Edition
- 877 pages
- The Real Case for Auschwitz Holocaust Handbooks Book 22
- Carlo Mattogno
- 28 February 2016 Carlo Mattogno
➶ [Reading] ➸ The Real Case for Auschwitz Holocaust Handbooks Book 22 By Carlo Mattogno ➫ – Centrumpowypadkowe.co.uk In 1993 Jewish theologian Deborah Lipstadt called British historian David Irving a “Holocaust denier” Irving sued her for libel in return Subseuently a court case unfolded in England which attract In Jewish Case for Kindle Ñ theologian Deborah Lipstadt called British historian David Irving a “Holocaust denier” Irving sued her for libel in return Subseuently a court case unfolded in England which attracted the attention of the world’s mass media in The sharpest weapon in The Real PDF \ Lipstadt’s defense arsenal was Jewish art historian Robert van Pelt who presented an expert report claiming to refute revisionist assertions about Auschwitz Because Irving had neither the support by any expert witnesses nor was he himself an expert on the Holocaust he inevitable lost the case Robert van Pelt was therefore praised as the defeater of revisionism When he published his revised expert report in his book The Case for Auschwitz in he even advanced to the foremost expert on Auschwitz in the public’s eyes Mattogno’s Auschwitz Real Case for Auschwitz Holocaust eBook Í the Case for Sanity is the revisionist response to Robert van Pelt Its first revelation is that van Pelt has committed plagiarism he plundered and basically regurgitated the research results published in and by French researcher Jean Claude Pressac yet without naming his source even once On than pages Mattogno thoroughly scrutinizes van Pelt’s contorted assertions by juxtaposing them to material and documentary facts Mattogno’s analysis is devastating for van Pelt as it reveals that van Pelt’s study of Auschwitz ignores crucial counter arguments fails to approach pivotal technical issues with technical means is highly inconsistent uses deceptive methods presents conflicting sources without due source criticism deforms all sources to serve the author’s perspective and reveals a shockingly threadbare knowledge of the history of Auschwitz Mattogno therefore concludes “The Case for Auschwitz is neither a scholarly nor a historical work; it is only a biased journalistic assemblage of poorly understood and poorly interpreted historical sources” This is a book of prime political and scholarly importance as it delivers the exterminationists’ case the most devastating blow ever.